A decade ago, I had a 6-month-old baby, and my husband and I, like most new parents, slept in fits and starts. One regular feature of our day was an early rise. It was the only way to get on top of the piles of laundry and dishes and catch our breaths, while the baby, we hoped, would sleep past 7:00 am. And so it was that on the morning of September 11, 2001, we were up, making coffee and toast in our kitchen in Victoria, British Columbia, with the radio playing when we heard about the first airplane crashing into the World Trade Centre.
Everyone thought it was a horrific accident. And then, only fifteen minutes later, the second airplane hit the South Tower. I badly wanted to believe that it, too, was accidental because the alternative was unthinkable. But by the time the Pentagon was hit a half hour later, and Flight 93 crashed into the field in Pennsylvania, it was obvious this was no accident.
My baby woke in the middle of the coverage. In a fog, we put him in his high chair with a tray of fruit while we listened, numb, for some reporter or expert – anyone, anywhere who could offer an explanation that made sense. But there was no sense to be found that morning. There was room only for the horror and for the premonition that many things in my world were about to change very quickly, very drastically.
A year after this, I began to write This Innocent Corner. It is not a story about what happened on September 11, 2001. However, the attack on the World Trade Centre, the tragic wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that followed, the paranoia that settled so comfortably over many societies, the sickening acts of brutality carried out at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, and the torture of prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in Cuba were features of the nightmarish landscape that emerged as I wrote. From 2002 to 2006, my days were shaped like this: early mornings, coffee in hand, I read newspaper reports of what was happening in the world as a result of the events of September 11, 2001; after breakfast, when I went to work, I read newspaper archives from the 1971 Liberation War. At times, the thirty years between the two events blurred and I would find myself not knowing what I was reading. I was sad and depressed by the brutality of people and apparent inability of politicians and other decision-makers to stop the violence. I was overwhelmed with all I did not understand about the world.
This Innocent Corner is set in the months preceding September 11, 2001. The final scene takes place in July 2001, mere weeks away from the attack, and no character even suspects it is coming. Setting the story at that time was a choice I made very early in the writing process. Through the story of one woman, I wanted to explore involvement, especially the kind of involvement which appears to be well-intended but which results in unforeseen long-term consequences. Robin’s very public opinions on women’s rights and peace are easily transformed into action when she becomes involved in Luna’s marriage arrangements. Robin thinks only to save Luna; the possible repercussions of her act do not even factor into her decision to lie, assign blame where it does not belong, and then walk away. She keeps her eye on the goal, and the means by which she must get there are, to her, justified because of the nobility of her end. Sadly, it’s a familiar script in world affairs; not the only script, but one that keeps raising its head, even though most governments and policy-makers profess to know better.
The 10th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Centre is unleashing another wave of speculation as we try, much as I did on the day of the attacks and subsequently through the writing of This Innocent Corner, to make some sense of the events and understand what caused the tragedy. It’s a daunting task for a fiction writer, when nearly every word of the reported story renders anything I can possibly imagine trivial by comparison. Essayist Adam Sternbergh, in the October 2011 issue of The Walrus, writes that we are all still struggling to find meaning in the events of September 11th. “We are now literally hard-wired as a planet – congregating globally, electronically, and perpetually – to ask that question again and again and again. The trouble is, we now assume that every event will eventually yield an answer….Yet ten years later, it still doesn’t make any sense – or at least no more sense than it should.”
The events which unfold in This Innocent Corner both precede and allude to the events of September 11, 2001. The eagle-eyed reader will spot the allusions. But if you’re not so eagle-eyed, here they are:
The World Trade Centre:
Amma laughed nervously. ‘These prospective brides! So bashful! But a little modesty goes a long way in a young girl, don’t you think?’ she said to Mrs. Alam, while I bristled into my tea. ‘Luna was just saying how much she would like to visit the new World Trade Centre.’
‘Oh.’ Rafiqul smiled. ‘But it’s just opened – and not really very interesting inside – far more impressive from the outside. Nevertheless, there are many more beautiful places in the city.’
‘Excuse me,’ Luna said. She rose and left the room, leaving behind stunned silence.” (p. 106-7)
New York City:
“‘Luna?’ Amma prompted when it became obvious and uncomfortable. ‘Tell this pleasant young man what you were saying about New York City.’” (p. 106)
Attack/Burn/Fall:
“I was back with Amma in less than twenty minutes, though unable to focus on how pora as a verb meant either to study, to read, to wear, to be uncultivated, to be vacant, to be unpaid, to ooze, to burn, to attack, or to fall.” (p. 50)
Skyscraper:
“Under [the bank’s] tasteful clock tower, Salt Spring’s version of a skyscraper, an equally decorous loans officer conjures up impossible figures.” (p. 194)
Box cutters:
Interestingly, the box cutters, which were believed to be have been the weapon used to overpower the flight crew on one of the aircraft, turned out to be a myth. There were no remains of any box cutters, and no one is sure exactly how they became woven into the narrative. Some conspiracy theorists use the box cutters as evidence that the attacks were masterminded by the US administration.
“I slice open the jute twine and brittle tape with paint-stained box cutters, then turn down the flaps. I don’t remember the last time I opened [the box]. Now, I need to see what is inside.” (p. 243)
The Pet Goat:
Similarly, there was debate about the exact title of this book. For weeks, it was referred to as My Pet Goat, and still references are made to the erroneous title.
“That night, Sunday, everyone except me goes to bed early. I can’t sleep. The quiet that blankets the house disallows rest. I get up and go to the living room. I pace between the television and front door. Then I eat corn flakes. I watch the second hand creep around the clock, three, four, five revolutions. Underneath a book – The Pet Goat – awfully juvenile, even for Jason – I find one of Hayley’s discarded magazines.” (p. 221)
Mohammed Atta:
As the many innocent Mohammed Attas whose names appear on no-fly lists already know, there are many people in the world who share this name. There is a fictional Mohammed Atta in This Innocent Corner.
“The journalist, Mohammed Atta – was he Bengali? West Pakistani? – said the much-maligned Biharis were not the only collaborators.” (p. 228)
This anniversary has also unleashed a flood of lists of best books about September 11th (including, from Salon.com, a list of the worst books). But there are commentators who believe we are still too close to the events at hand to be able to fictionalize them very well. Tolstoy did not write War and Peace, his masterpiece about the invasion of Russia by Napoleon until 60 years after the event. Mohsin Hamid, author of The Reluctant Fundamentalist, says it may be the wrong approach to even try to define “best” on this subject. “Events should have as many definitions as the number of people who experience them,” he says to BBC News, leaving the gates open for many more books to be written on September 11th.